Is this good advice for men for them to wait to marry until they can financially support two households? ?

Given that the divorce rate is between 50 to 70% and for the most part in divorce settlements men are required to pay child support, alimony, in addition to splitting up half or more of the assets acquired during the marriage, isn't the above statement good advice for men to follow because a significant portion of them will have to support two households. Is this good advice for men for them to wait to marry until they can financially support two households? ?
Maybe good advice for the weak and lazy man who doesn't know how to keep a woman. Or the guys who never really commit to the person they are with and the players and scum who can't keep it in there pants. Really if you have an honest man and woman and they have love for one and another and do not believe in divorce then you would not need this but in reality this is what prenups are for.


Is this good advice for men for them to wait to marry until they can financially support two households? ?
Well, with logic like that, you might as well tell males that they should delay marriage until they can financially support at least three households: their own, the one of their ex's (including or not including the couple's children, if any, as the case may be), and the one of their lover(s) due to children born to the same out-of-wedlock as a result of the male's infidelity.
Based on my personal experience, you should also tell women that they need to wait until they can financially support two households. I'm the one paying huge spousal support after my divorce and lost nearly all of my assets in the process!





Welcome to the 21st Century. The best advice to people getting married is to make sure you have a rock solid prenuptial agreement.
any men need to sign pre-nup to protect themselves. just like buying insurance. Any uptight women who refuse to have hidden agenda and need to find a stupid sucker